The Supreme Court unanimously found the new law that could lead to a ban of TikTok does not violate the First Amendment ...
On Friday, the Supreme Court delivered a sweeping broadside against the First Amendment of the Constitution just days ahead ...
The company argued that the law, citing potential Chinese threats to the nation’s security, violated its First Amendment ...
The move came after President-elect Donald Trump promised to issue an executive order that would roll back the effective date ...
This ruling will disappoint the app’s 170 million users in the United States. But it reflects eminently reasonable deference ...
Paul said he was disappointed, adding, "I do believe that banning a social media app like TikTok is a violation of the First Amendment." ...
Doesn’t the Constitution mean what it says? Doesn’t no law mean no law? Regrettably, today, no law means whatever the court says it means.
It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States.” The TikTok ban ...
The Supreme Court heard arguments for two-and-a-half hours on Friday over whether TikTok can be banned in the United States ... violates the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protection against ...