On Friday, the Supreme Court delivered a sweeping broadside against the First Amendment of the Constitution just days ahead ...

Groups filed briefs with the Supreme Court against the TikTok divest-or-ban law, arguing it violates the First Amendment, and in favor of it.

This ruling will disappoint the app’s 170 million users in the United States. But it reflects eminently reasonable deference ...

The company argued that the law, citing potential Chinese threats to the nation’s security, violated its First Amendment ...

We thank President Trump for providing the necessary clarity and assurance to our service providers that they will face no ...

Although former President Donald Trump issued an executive order in 2020 directing ByteDance to divest itself of TikTok in the United States, his amicus brief in the Supreme Court, filed late last ...

Doesn’t the Constitution mean what it says? Doesn’t no law mean no law? Regrettably, today, no law means whatever the court ...

Will TikTok finally meet its fate Sunday? The future of the app with more than 170 million American users remains uncertain ...

This conclusion will disappoint the app’s 170 million users in the United States. But it reflects ... holding that it passed First Amendment muster. TikTok then asked the Supreme Court to ...

“It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States.” This follows ...

It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States.” The TikTok ban ...