On Friday, the Supreme Court delivered a sweeping broadside against the First Amendment of the Constitution just days ahead ...

This ruling will disappoint the app’s 170 million users in the United States. But it reflects eminently reasonable deference ...

Even as the Supreme Court upheld Congress' mandate that TikTok's Chinese owner sell the platform or shut it down, the First ...

Today, no law means whatever the court says it means. That happened last week when the Supreme Court upheld congressional ...

The company argued that the law, citing potential Chinese threats to the nation’s security, violated its First Amendment ...

We thank President Trump for providing the necessary clarity and assurance to our service providers that they will face no ...

Doesn’t the Constitution mean what it says? Doesn’t no law mean no law? Regrettably, today, no law means whatever the court ...

This conclusion will disappoint the app’s 170 million users in the United States. But it reflects ... holding that it passed First Amendment muster. TikTok then asked the Supreme Court to ...

“It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States.” This follows ...

It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States.” The TikTok ban ...

In his executive orders, Trump repeatedly asserted that he can make and interpret law, alongside Congress and the courts.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld on Friday a law banning TikTok in the United States on national security grounds if its Chinese ...