The U.S. Supreme Court kept millions of Louisianans — and millions more across the nation — waiting for one of the most ...

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas reiterated his push for the court to reevaluate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

A few days later, Justice Clarence Thomas explained why this is not acceptable judicial procedure. Justice Thomas’s comments came on June 18 in his concurring opinion in United States v. Skrmetti.

Justice Thomas delights conservatives in shunning gender-affirming care ‘experts’ by: Ella Lee, Zach Schonfeld, The Hill Posted: Jun 20, 2025 / 03:02 AM PDT Updated: Jun 20, 2025 / 07:01 AM PDT ...

Justice Clarence Thomas on Wednesday said that courts should not defer to “self-described experts” on gender-affirming care, suggesting it is a matter of medical uncertainty.

Clarence Thomas urges courts to end deferring to ‘experts’ on gender affirming care by: Ella Lee, The Hill Posted: Jun 18, 2025 / 11:32 AM EDT Updated: Jun 18, 2025 / 11:47 AM EDT ...

Yet this victory comes with an asterisk: In a concurrence, Justice Clarence Thomas—joined, alarmingly, by Justice Brett Kavanaugh—launched an assault on civil rights law that would devastate ...

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the unanimous opinion, with Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ...

Clarence Thomas has spent his professional life trying to return American law to the Declaration of Independence’s founding promise that individuals should be judged as individuals rather than ...