The year 2016 marked the inception of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), which was crowned as a truly transformative measure. Enacted for clear, hastened ...

Supreme Court held that the penalties imposed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [NCDRC] are regulatory in nature and do not constitute “debt” under the IBC. Thus, penalty imposed ...

The NCDRC had imposed several penalties on the ground that the homebuyers were not given the promised possession of the ...

Abstract- The jurisdictional lines between the NCLT and High Courts under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act (MMDR Act), 1957, and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 ...

The Supreme Court ruled that interim moratoriums under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) do not protect individuals or companies from regulatory penalties imposed under consumer protection laws ...

India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has resolved 28,818 applications involving ₹10 lakh crore, improving the country ...

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has ordered that Jaiprakash Associates should be acquired as a single entity, ...

India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) saw 40,943 applications, resolving 28,818 worth Rs 10 lakh crore pre-admission. Minister Harsh Malhotra cited significant reforms and infrastructure ...

In a significant development, the Supreme Court today (March 4) ruled that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the ...

India -Interim Moratorium Not An Escape From Consumer Penalties: Supreme Court Clarifies. Legal News and Analysis - India - ...