The Supreme Court unanimously found the new law that could lead to a ban of TikTok does not violate the First Amendment ...
The company argued that the law, citing potential Chinese threats to the nation’s security, violated its First Amendment ...
Even as the Supreme Court upheld Congress' mandate that TikTok's Chinese owner sell the platform or shut it down, the First ...
This ruling will disappoint the app’s 170 million users in the United States. But it reflects eminently reasonable deference ...
The case pits the First Amendment's right to free ... Congress restricted only foreign adversary control: TikTok may continue operating in the United States and presenting the same content ...
It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States.” The TikTok ...
Will TikTok finally meet its fate Sunday? The future of the app with more than 170 million American users remains uncertain ...
“It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States.” This follows ...
The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments last week on TikTok’s request for a delay in the ban, arguing that it violates the U.S. Constitution’s First ... a ban in the United States.
Paul said he was disappointed, adding, "I do believe that banning a social media app like TikTok is a violation of the First Amendment." ...